Martin Vronsky
-
Posts
2,893 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Posts posted by Martin Vronsky
-
-
Quote
In this video we compare the newly released Fujifilm Instax Mini 40 to our all time favourite Instax camer tha SQ6. Both cameras use different sized film stock which does offer a different perspective. Find out which one is the better camera between the two.
-
Quote
I took an a1 and an a7R IV to Yellowstone and Grand Teton for over a week. These are my thoughts on how the bodies compare!
-
Quote
If you are anything like me you probably wondered how photographers got their photos so sharp from the foreground to background of the image. In this first video from my chasing volcanoes series in Iceland I discuss how I focus and use DOF, apps and when to focus stack.
-
Quote
This was UNEXPECTED! Is the Sony Alpha 1 better than the Canon EOS R5 for bird photography? A lot of you wanted me to try out the Sony in the field, so I did! Let's find out how I went! Let me know your own thoughts in the comments? Is the A1 the best camera around or does the cheaper R5 even have an edge?
-
Quote
We compare four large tripods from Gitzo, Manfrotto, Leofoto and Sirui. We also tell you what to look for in a good tripod so you can pick the best one for you – even if it's not included in our roundup.
The specific tripod models included in this review are the Gitzo GT2532, Sirui W2204, Leofoto LQ-284C, and Chris' battle-worn Manfrotto 055MF4.
Chapters:
- 0:00 - Intro
- 1:00 - Chris' old Manfrotto tripod
- 1:51 - Tripods tested
- 3:17 - Collapsed size
- 4:21 - Tripod height
- 6:04 - Tripod weight
- 7:36 - Center columns
- 10:53 - Leg locks
- 14:39 - Vibration test
- 16:05 - Vibration test results
- 18:54 - Which one is right for you?
-
Quote
For those who didn't get enough from my review on the Olympus M.Zuiko 8-25mm f4 Pro, here's some additional tests that you asked me to do, my famous brick wall tests 😂 I also want to answer a few questions in this video about the comparison against Olympus popular M.Zuiko 7-24mm f2.8 Pro. Watch and find out which one is for you and whether the new 2021 lens is BETTER than the older, faster brother.
-
-
Quote
Photographer Dustin Abbott shares a thorough review of the compact yet premium Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G prime lens.
-
Quote
Nikon have brought to the Z mount 2 exciting and versatile macro lenses, which one fits your use-case?
-
Quote
The Panasonic Leica 25-50mm F1.7 is a great video lens, and a perfect match – both physically and in rendering – for the Panasonic Leica 10-25mm F1.7. We tell you all you need to know about this lens.
See full resolution sample images from this episode: https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galle...
- 0:00 - Intro
- 0:28 - Focal length
- 0:56 - Design and build quality
- 2:19 - Autofocus
- 2:43 - Chromatic aberrations
- 3:30 - Minimum focus
- 3:59 - Colour matching with 10-25mm
- 4:21 - Focus breathing
- 4:41 - Parfocal?
- 5:14 - Sharpness
- 6:15 - Bokeh
- 6:35 - Who is it for?
-
Press release:
Panasonic Introduces New Full-range F1.7 Telephoto Zoom Digital Interchangeable Lens for Mirrorless Cameras.
The LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. (H-X2550) is versatile for photography and videography.
Newark, NJ (July 7, 2021) - Panasonic is proud to introduce a new telephoto zoom digital interchangeable lens, the LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. (H-X2550), which boasts a large F1.7 aperture throughout the entire 50-100mm (35mm camera equivalent) zoom range with exceptionally high optical performance clearing the stringent LEICA standards. The LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. excels at both photo shooting and video recording, satisfying professional photographers and videographers alike.
The new LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. (H-X2550) is been designed to be paired with with the LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 10-25mm / F1.7 ASPH. (H-X1025), a currently available lens which has been highly acclaimed by creators. They both feature the full-range F1.7 high-speed aperture that provides beautiful bokeh and high descriptiveness. The two lenses cover a focusing distance from wide angle to telephoto, functioning as eight fixed focal length lenses (20mm / 24mm / 28mm / 35mm / 50mm / 75mm / 85mm / 100mm, 35mm camera equivalent) providing the same or an even higher level of descriptiveness than a fixed focal length lens can offer. They have common aperture, high descriptive performance, shape and operability, enabling creators to produce their own unique image product using these two lenses with minimal workflow.
Comprising 16 elements in 11 groups, the lens system features an aspherical lens and three Extra-low Dispersion (ED) lenses that effectively suppress the axial chromatic aberration and chromatic aberration of magnification. Spherical aberration and distortion are also corrected by the aspherical lenses for stunningly high resolution. The use of aspherical lenses and the optimum design of the lens system results in a compact size and light weight while still achieving outstanding optical performance.
Compatibility with a maximum 240-fps high-speed sensor drive realizes high-speed, high-precision auto focusing. In addition to the silent operation achieved by the inner focus drive system, the stepless aperture ring and micro-step drive system in the aperture control section help the camera to smoothly catch up to brightness changes when zooming or panning. The optical design achieves exceptional barycentric stability to minimize image shifts during zooming. A focus ring is equipped for intuitive, precise focusing and linear/ non-linear setting can also be switched with this ring. The LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. also excels in video recording performance with a mechanism that suppresses focus breathing at entire zoom range.
The LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. boasts minimum focusing distance of 0.28m (at wide end, 0.31m at tele end) and the maximum magnification ratio of 0.42x (35mm camera equivalent) for superior macro photography. The rugged dust/splash-resistant* design for high mobility withstands use under harsh conditions even in 10 degrees below zero. Filter diameter is in 77mm.
The LEICA DG VARIO-SUMMILUX 25-50mm / F1.7 ASPH. (H-X2550) will be available at valued channel partners for $1,799.99 at the end of August.
*Dust and Splash Resistant does not guarantee that damage will not occur if this lens is subjected to direct contact with dust and water.
-
Quote
Hands on review of the Tamron 11-20mm F/2.8 APS-C Ultra Wide Angle Lens. A 35mm equivalent focal length range of 17-30mm. See the results from Jay P's walk around shoot in Los Angeles capturing architectural iconic structures using this wide angle lens built specifically for APS-C Cameras. Take a look and let us know what you think!
-
Quote
In this tutorial I show you 8 beginner mistakes to avoid! Products I use for macro.
-
Quote
- 00:00 - Intro
- 01:39 - Design and controls
- 05:38 - Coverage
- 07:17 - Landscape comparison
- 11:03 - Bokeh comparison
- 11:49 - Portrait comparison
- 12:54 - Focusing comparison
- 13:49 - Focusing for movies
- 15:00 - Vlogging comparison
- 17:26 - Focus breathing comparison
- 18:16 - Verdict and sample images
-
Quote
Better late than never, I finally reviewed the new Olympus M.Zuiko 8-25mm f4 Pro ultra wide zoom lens and used it in a variety of applications, including some paid jobs. So I get to real feel of OMDS's first ever lens release. Watch and find out my take on this lens and how it compares to the popular professional M.Zuiko 7-14mm f2.8 Pro.
-
Quote
Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 VS Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Comparison for Sony E Mount Cameras. Find out which one is better for you?
-
Quote
The one you've all been waiting for. Many thanks to my friend and brother Simon for loaning me this great lens for a few weeks for testing.
-
Quote
Chris turns a trip to Calgary Zoo into something of a safari, as he reviews the Canon RF 600mm F11 USM as a wildlife lens. Its long focal length and relatively modest price make it an attractive option for birding and nature photography but, as Chris discovers, it's not without limitations.
- 0:00 - Intro
- 0:48 - Sample images
- 1:42 - Design and build quality
- 2:28 - Autofocus limitations
- 3:15 - Minimum focus distance
- 3:59 - Autofocus Speed
- 4:50 - Sharpness
- 5:27 - Bokeh
- 5:51 - Flare
- 6:37 - Who is it for?
-
Quote
Professional wildlife photographers Tony & Chelsea Northrup review EVERY wildlife lens under $2,000 for Canon, Sony, and Nikon cameras. Then, they ranked them from worst to best. The rankings are:
10. Sigma 150-600 Sport ($1,850)
Pros: Durable AF
Cons: Big AND expensive, slow AF, less sharp than it’s cheaper Contemporary cousin9. Tamron 150-600 G1 ($600)
The least expensive lens is also the worst ranked… but if this is all that fits your budget, it’s still a good place to start, and when you’re ready to upgrade you’ll be able to trade it in at KEH.Pros: Versatile, Inexpensive, Capable of producing great wildlife images… if you can get VERY CLOSE
Cons: SLOW AF. SO VERY SLOW. Really soft at 600mm. Our tests have shown it's outperformed by the Canon 400 f5.6 or Nikon 200-500
TIPS:
Use the focus limiter
Shut the aperture down to f/8 if you can8. Canon 600 f/11 ($700)
Pros: Lightweight, Decent close-focusing, Sharp when you can fill the frame, Great stabilization, Decent AF speed (8 of 10)
Cons:
Only works with RF cameras, and we found AF to be frustrating with the R and RP. Thus, we can only recommend using it on the R5 and R6.
Not nearly as sharp as the 800mm f/11, considering cropping
Only work with their mirrorless R cameras, and the only R cameras we can recommend for wildlife are the expensive R6 ($2,500) and R5 ($3,900).
f/11 gives you less background blur/subject separation
Lets in less light leading to noise in low light or high shutter speed situations7. Canon 400mm f5.6 ($850-$100 used)
Pros: Light, Well-built, 400mm makes finding subjects easier, adds versatility
Reason it’s in the test: it’s sharper than these other popular wildlife lenses, even cropped to 600 or 800mm
Cons: Not stabilized, so you always have to keep your shutter speed at 1/500 or shorter (unless you’re on an R5 or R6). Slow AF. Doesn’t focus very close. Discontinued… but KEH!Above this point, it gets REALLY close. There are NO losers
6. Tamron 150-600 G2 ($1000-$1200)
Pros:
DRASTICALLY improved sharpness over the G1
Handling?
Light weight
BEST magnification up close (some breathing)
Cons:
Slow AF compared to native lenses
AF lagged a bit on fast-moving subjects, so birds flying at me at close range were basically always a little out of focus
Not unsharp, but kinda hazy
Truly awful chromatic aberration when shooting flying birds
Above this point, EVERYTHING IS RECOMMENDED.5. Tamron 150-500 ($1400)
If you’re a Sony photographer who plans to travel or hike with the lens, or you don’t want to drop an extra $500 on the Sony 200-600, this is the lens for you.Pros: GREAT AF… but it depends on your body. We only recommend the a1 for wildlife now, primarily because of EVF lag in other bodies. LIGHT. Easily handholdable.
Cons:
When you crop to 800mm, the equivalent aperture is f/11… compared to f/8.4 of the Tamron G2 and Sony 200-600
Pretty bad chromatic aberration in subjects with the sky behind them
Focus not as reliable as the Sony 200-600, especially with flying birds near the camera, the focus lagged behind the bird a bit, so the tail would be in focus instead of the head.
Recommended for:
Sony photographers traveling light or who don’t want to spend $2k on the 200-6004. Sigma 150-600 Contemporary ($900)
Pros: Great price, Great sharpness at 600mm, Good magnification / close focusing. Real-world, VERY sharp shots at close range. Better pictures than the Tamron zooms and it’s big brother. Lock can stop the lens at 150 or 600
Cons: Slow AF compared to native lenses, Not great for flying birds (missed focus A LOT), Chromatic aberration for birds against a clear blue sky was pretty bad (not the worst)
Lots of “bad copies” out there (quality control isn’t as consistent as name-brand lenses)Recommended for:
Canon DSLR photographers
Nikon DSLR photographers on a tight budget3. Canon 800mm f/11 ($900 new)
Pros:
Sharpest lens in the test
Good AF
Amazing stabilization (how slow?)
Shockingly small and light
Cons:
TERRIBLE minimum focusing distance
Even cropped to 800mm, it’s a full stop slower than the zooms
Only the R5 and R6 have AF systems and viewfinders we really recommend… but if you have an R5, this lens is a no-brainer. Just carry it with you just in case.2. Sony 200-600 ($2,000 new)
Pros:
Fast AF
SHARP
Internal zooming
Cons:
Most expensive
VERY heavy
Poor magnification up close
TERRIBLE focus breathing… 325mm at close range!
Tips:
Don’t bother with a TC
DO attach extension tubes if you want to fill the frame with small animalsSony photographers with a budget under $10k
1. Nikon 200-500 ($1,400 new, $1,200 used)
Pros:
Fast AF
Great close-focusing (puts it ahead of the Sony)
Cons:
A couple hundred more than the Tamron and Sigma -
Quote
Want to photograph birds from your backyard? Michael Corrado offers his pro tips for bird photography, such as what camera and lens to use, camera gear and camera settings.
-
Quote
Photographer Dustin Abbott shares a thorough review of the compact yet premium Sony FE 24mm F2.8 G prime lens.
-
-
Quote
Let's take a look at an unconventional way to use a beauty dish for beauty and portrait photography that gives amazing results!
-
How to Quickly Shoot Family Formals with Zero Stress!
in Wedding Photography
Posted